Investigating the Impact of Religion on Income Inequality
Subject Areas : Islamic theology
1 -
Keywords:
Abstract :
The present study aims to investigate the effect of the role of religion on income inequality. For this purpose, a simple economic-political model was considered and following the study of Azzi and Ehernberg (1975), the basic structure of Meltzer-Richard was completed by modeling religion as the intensity of satisfaction from charitable donations for public goods. It was developed in which the more religious people are, the greater the satisfaction they receive from voluntary donation. Thus, the political process has led to a reduction in the size of government in more religious countries, meaning lower levels of spending on public goods and redistribution, and tax-based redistributions have shaped income distribution, which means more income inequality in more religious countries. The " belief in an after- life " index was considered a measure of religiosity and the Gini coefficient was considered a measure of income inequality. Finally,the GMM, FMIL and (2ls) IV econometric models have been used to estimate the patterns over a period of 15 years (2005 - 2019). The results showed: a ) There is a positive correlation between religiosity, being and income inequality. b ) The coefficient of variable belief in an after- life in all regression models with the presence and absence of control variable is positive and significant. This means that countries with higher levels of belief in the afterlife have more inequality. c ) The coefficient of variable GDP per capita is negative and significant in all patterns and shows that countries with higher per capita incomes tend to distribute income more evenly. Perhaps the inherent priority of religion, smaller government, and lower welfare spending in more religious countries is only a reflection of the broader perspective of research.
Alesina, A., Campante, F.R., Tabellini, G.R., 2008. Why is fiscal policy often procyclical?Journal of the European Economic Association 6 (5), 1006–1036.
Azzi, C., Ehrenberg, R., 1975. Household allocation of time and church attendance. Journalof Political Economy 83 (1), 27–56.
Barrett, D.B., Kurian, G.T., Johnson, T.M., 2001. World Christian Encyclopedia, 2nd ed.Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Barro, R.J., McLeary, R.M., 2003a. Religion and economic growth across countries.American Sociological Review 68 (5), 760–781.
Barro, R.J., McLeary, R.M., 2003b. International determinants of religiosity. NBERWorking.Paper No. 10147.
Barro, R.J., McLeary, R.M., 2005. Which countries have state religions? Quarterly Journal.of Economics 120, 1331–1370.
Barro, R.J., McLeary, R.M., 2006. Religion and economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives.20, 49–72.
Blomberg, S.B., Deleire, T., Hess, G., 2006. The (after) life-cycle theory of religious contributions.CESifo Working Paper, No: 1854.
Brooks, A.C., 2003. Religious faith and charitable giving. Policy Review 39–50.
Clark, A., and O. Lelkes, 2004. Deliver Us From Evil: Religion as Insurance, Mimeo,DELTA, Paris.
Cox, D., Raines, F., 1985. Interfamily transfers and income redistribution. In: David,Martin, Smeeding, Timothy (Eds.), Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty, and Measures.of Well-Being. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gale, W., Scholz, J.K., 1994. Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth.Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4), 145–160.
Gill, A., Lundsgaarde, E., 2004. State welfare spending and religiosity: a cross-national.analysis. Rationality and Society 16 (4), 399–436.
Hall, R.E., Jones, C.I., 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per.worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83–116.
Heinemann, F., Schneider, F.G., 2011. Religion and the shadow economy. ZEW Discussion.Papers, 11-038.
Huber, J., 2005. Religious Belief, Religious Participation, and Social Policy Attitudes.Across Countries, Mimeo, Columbia University.
Hungerman, D.M., 2005. Are church and state substitutes? Evidence from the 1996welfare reform. Journal of Public Economics 89 (11–12), 2245–2267.
Iannacone, L.R., 1998. Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic.Literature 36, 1465–1496.
Jaffe, K., 2005. Science, religion and economic development. Interciencia 30 (6), 82–91.
essler, D., Masson, A., 1989. Bequest and wealth accumulation: are some pieces of thepuzzle missing? Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 141–152.
LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1999. The quality of government.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15, 222–279.
Lederman, D., Loayza, N., Soares, R.R., 2005. Accountability and corruption: political institutionsmatter. Economics and Politics 17 (3), 1–35.
Lehrer, E.L., 1995. The effects of religion on the labor supply of married women. Social.Science Research 24, 281–301.
Lehrer, E.L., 1996. Religion as a determinant of fertility. Journal of Population Economics.9, 173–196.
Lehrer, E.L., 1999. Religion as a determinant of educational attainment: an economic.perspective. Social Science Research 28, 358–379.
Lehrer, E.L., Chiswick, C., 1993. Religion as a determinant ofmarital stability. Demography.30 (3), 385–404.
McCleary, R.M., 2007. Salvation, damnation, and economic incentives. Journal of Contemporary.Religion 22 (1), 49–74.
McCleary, R.M., Barro, R.J., 2006. Religion and economy in an international panel. Journal forthe Scientific Study of Religion 45, 149–175.
Meltzer, A., Richard, S.F., 1981. A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of.Political Economy 89 (5), 914–927.
Norris, P., Inglehart, R., 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide.Cambridge University Press, New York
Heltberg, R. (2002). The Growth Elasticity of Poverty. United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research: 1-15.
Ma rtinez-Vazquez, Jorge, Blanca Moreno-Dodson, & Violeta Vulovic. (2012). The Impactof Tax and Expenditure Policies on Income Distribution: Evidence From a Large Panelof Countries. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series, pp. 12-30
Ar mey, Richard K. (1995). The Freedom Revolution: the New Republican House MajorityLeader Tells Why Big Government Failed, why freedom works, and how we will rebuildAmerica (p. 316). Regnery Pub
To daro, Michael.P. (1997). Economic Development, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Ku znets, Simon. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American EconomicReview, pp. 1-28.
Ellis A)1980(. Psychotherapy and atheistic values: A response to A. E. Bergin’s psychotherapy and religious values. J Consult Clin Psychol; 48(1): 635-9.
Maltby J, Day L)2000(. Depressive symptoms and religious orientation: Examining the relationship between religiosity and depression within the context of other correlates of depression. Pers Indiv Differ; 28(2): 383-93.
Mohr, W. K. (2006). Spiritual issues in psychiatric care. Perspective in Psychiatric care, 42, 3, 174-183..
Simon Kuznets, “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, The American EconomicReview, Volume:45, No:1, 1954, pp.1-28
Almas Heshmati, “Inequalities and Their Measurement”, IZA Discussion Paper, No: 1219, Bonn.2004
Sergei Guriev - William Megginson, “Privatization: What have We Learned?”, Annual WorldBank Conference on Development Economics, 2007, pp.249-96
Arye Hillman - Heinrich Ursprung, “Political culture and economic decline”, European Journalof Political Economy, Volume:16, No:2, 2000, pp.189-213
Peter Boettke, Collapse of Development Planning, NYU Press, New York 1994
Af onso, Antonio; Schuknecht, Ludger & Tanzi, Vito. (2010). Income DistributionDeterminants and Public Spending Efficiency. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3),
Ar mey, Richard K. (1995). The Freedom Revolution: the New Republican House MajorityLeader Tells Why Big Government Failed, why freedom works, and how we will rebuildAmerica (p. 316). Regnery Pub.
Ku znets, Simon. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American EconomicReview, pp. 1-28.
Ba rro, Robert & Martin, Sala-i. (1995). Economic Growth. Boston: Massachusetts Instituteof Technology Press.
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی
صفحات 126 ـ 107
بررسی تاثیر نفش مذهب بر نابرابری درآمدها
مصطفی حیدری هراتمه 1
چکیده
تحقیق حاضر با هدف بررسی تاثیر نقش مذهب بر نابرابری درآمدها در نظر گرفته شده است. بدین منظور یک مدل ساده اقتصادی - سیاسی در نظر گرفته شد و با پیروی از مطالعه آذی و اهرنبرگ (1975)، ساختار پایه ملتزر - ریچارد با مدلسازی مذهبیبودن به عنوان شدت رضایت حاصل از کمکهای خیریه برای کالاهای عمومی، تکمیل و بسط داده شد که در آن هرچقدر افراد مذهبیتر باشند رضایتی که از اعانههای داوطلبانه کسب میکنند بیشتر است. بنابراین فرآیند سیاسی منجر به کاهش اندازه دولت در کشورهای مذهبیتر و به معنای سطوح پائینتر هزینه برای کالاهای عمومی و بازتوزیع بوده و بازتوزیعهای مبتنی بر مالیات، توزیع درآمد را شکل داده که به معنای نابرابری بیشتر درآمد در کشورهای مذهبیتر است. شاخص" اعتقاد به زندگی پس از مرگ" معیار مذهبی بودن و ضریب جینی معیار نابرابری درآمد در نظر گرفته شد و در نهایت از الگوهای اقتصادسنج GMM ، FMIL و (2ls) IV جهت تخمین الگوها در دوره زمانی 15 ساله (1384 – 1398) استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان داد : الف) همبستگی مثبتی بین مذهبیبودن و نابرابری درآمد وجود دارد ب) ضریب متغیر اعتقاد به زندگی پس از مرگ در تمام مدل های رگرسیونی با وجود و عدم وجود متغیر کنترلی مثبت و معنادار است. به این معنا که کشورهای دارای سطوح بالاتر اعتقاد به زندگی پس از مرگ دارای نابرابری بیشتری می باشند . ج) ضریب متغیر GDP سرانه منفی و در تمام الگوها معنادار است و نشان میدهد که کشورهای دارای درآمدهای سرانه بالاتر گرایش به توزیع برابرتر درآمد دارند. شاید اولویت ذاتی مذهب ، دولت کوچکتر و هزینههای رفاهی کمتر در کشورهای مذهبیتر ، تنها نمود چشمانداز کلیتر تحقیق باشد.
واژگان کلیدی
مذهب، نابرابری درآمد، اعتقاد به زندگی پس از مرگ، شایستگی رستگاری، 2ls .
[1] . استادیار گروه اقتصاد و مدیریت، واحد نراق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نراق، ایران.
Email: heidarimu@yahoo.com
تاریخ دریافت: 4/7/1400 پذیرش نهایی: 8/10/1400