Protecting human dignity and respecting the rights of non-Muslims in Imami jurisprudence and subject law
Subject Areas : Islamic theology
Toraj
Hematti Farsani
1
Alireza
Salimi
2
ALIREZA
HOSSINI
3
Mohammad Hossein
Nazemi Ashani
4
Keywords: Non-Muslim rights, Imami jurisprudence, Islamic penal code.,
Abstract :
The religion of Islam has not only dealt with matters concerning Muslims, but also, in an overview, has drawn up rules for non-Muslims and respect for their rights; In the Islamic approach, non-Muslims are either considered as dhimmis, covenants, and trustees who, although present as a minority in the Muslim community, are supported, or who are among the non-Muslims who are in conflict with Muslims. There are those who are known as military infidels and therefore are not respected by Islam. A look at the sources of Imami jurisprudence shows that the breadth, property and honor of non-Muslims who are under the protection of the Islamic community are considered inviolable; Thus, Muslims have no right to attack them; Because in this case they will be reprimanded. The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, by recognizing the religious, Christian and Zoroastrian individuals as religious minorities, has also recognized their rights. In the Islamic Penal Code in 1392, the legislature, by establishing jurisprudential standards in some areas, including adultery with a Muslim, sodomy, tafkhiz, considered the death sentence as an aggravation of punishment for non-Muslims and in drinking alcohol, as a factor A discount was given to non-Muslims only if they pretended to have a limit. Regarding diyat, the equality of diyat of non-Muslim and non-Muslim minorities was maintained, taking into account the opinion of the leadership. Apart from usury, no distinction was made between Muslims and non-Muslims regarding punishments. However, in the field of retribution, a new approach to expanding the scope of the safe has been pursued, which indicates a step towards greater support for non-military infidels, even those who are not among the minorities recognized in the constitution.
قرآن کریم. (1389). ترجمه ناصر مکارم شیرازی، قم.
نهج‌البلاغه. (بی‌تا). ترجمه محمّد جواد شریعت. تهران: انتشارات اساطیر، چاپ اول.
الماسی، نجاد علی. (1368). تعارض قوانین. تهران: نشر مرکز دانشگاهی، چاپ اول.
احمدی، موسی. (1383). حقوق اهل کتاب: (چگونگی روابط مسلمانان با آنان در قرآن). قم: مرکز انتشارات مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی، چاپ اول.
آقا جمال خوانسارى، محمّدبن حسین. (1366). شرح آقا جمال‌الدین خوانسارى بر غررالحکم و دررالکلم. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران، جلد سوم، چاپ چهارم.
حاجتی شورکی، سیدمحمّد. و محمّد‌جعفری. (1394). بررسی تطبیقی امکان، ضرورت و کیفیت معاد در دین زرتشت و اسلام، نشریه معرفت ادیان، شماره 24.
________، _____. سید‌اکبر حسینی قلعه بهمن. (1395). بررسی حقیقت مرگ در دین زرتشت، نشریه معرفت ادیان، شماره 27.
خاکپور، حسین. و الهام السادات حسینی. (1392). بررسی حقوق اقلیت‌های دینی و جزیه در قرآن. پژوهشنامه معارف قرآنی، شماره 15.