List of Articles میرزا مهدی اصفهانی

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - compurriny faith in the viewpoint of mulla sadra (motaalia school) and mirza isphany (tafkik school)
   
  one of the most important concepts that causes teological and philsophical debates in the muslim word and the chrition and jewish is explaining the word of “faith”. today discassions about fuith and it's vole in the formation of religious belief, play an important role More

  one of the most important concepts that causes teological and philsophical debates in the muslim word and the chrition and jewish is explaining the word of “faith”. today discassions about fuith and it's vole in the formation of religious belief, play an important role in new topics in the philisiply of religion and theology. this artucl try to review and investiyate this issue from the point of view of mulla sadra(hekmat motaalih) and mirza mahdi isphany the founder of dustinction school(tafkik) mulla sadra belives that faith is based of reuson and beside verbul acknoweldtment and heart authentication. he emphesuze on practiciny by organs of bocly. but mirza mahdi belives that in the first staye faith is based on heart acknowledgment and cogonition and in the next step based on verbul confession and this cognition in the grace of god and it dosn't obtain throuyh veasoning. in this inquiry we try to compare thess tow stanclpoints and explain the resemblances and differnces of these two thinkers and finally comare the cineept of faith in the viwepoint of mulla sadra and mirza mahdi isphany Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Validity of the Qur'anic Document and Validity from the Viewpoint of the Separation School (Emphasizing on Mehdi Esfahani's views)
   
  The Qur'an is the first and foremost source in the interpretation of the teachings of Islam, the validity of which is accepted by the majority of Muslim thinkers, but historically some - whether Sunnis or Shiites like the Qur'an and the Akhbaris - in either or Both have More

  The Qur'an is the first and foremost source in the interpretation of the teachings of Islam, the validity of which is accepted by the majority of Muslim thinkers, but historically some - whether Sunnis or Shiites like the Qur'an and the Akhbaris - in either or Both have been in doubt or denied. The school of separation led by Mirza Mehdi Esfahani has had a particular interest in the source of traditions, but has a different position on the validity of the Qur'an as the epistemic source of religion. This article will show that the separatist schools, especially their first spectrum, either questioned or denied the validity or validity of the Qur'anic scripture, or they needed it. The first part of the article explains the position of some of the schools of distinction regarding the damage to the validity of the Qur'anic document by proposing a theory of distortion and its criticism. The second part of the article is devoted to examining and criticizing their position on undermining the validity of the Qur'anic verses by focusing on such arguments as: the division of human science into divine and human, the divisive aspect of the Qur'anic traditions, the separation of texts from appearance. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Comparison of reason and its realm from the point of view of Mulla Sadra and Mirza Isfahani
  Shahabaldin  vahidi mehrjardi mohsen marvi nam
  20.1001.1.98991735.1400.11.43.13.0
  The word ‘’Reason’’, is one of the notions that have been defined variously. Some identified it with the human being and some considered it as origin of misleading and faults of Humanity and even the cause of our falling from Heaven. According to some Reason is the same More

  The word ‘’Reason’’, is one of the notions that have been defined variously. Some identified it with the human being and some considered it as origin of misleading and faults of Humanity and even the cause of our falling from Heaven. According to some Reason is the same as philosophy and to others it should be separated from philosophy. Philosophers have been glorifying it and the Ahl-Hadith have been denying it. Meanwhile Mulla Sadra (Muslim philosopher) considered Reason as an analytic Faculty and a being placed in highly grades of soul(Nafs), that comes in divisions from potential to Used(bi al-mostafad) Reason. On the other hand Mirza considered the Reason as a created being and as an illuminated by God which is clear by itself and a thing by which others are cleared. He sees it as a reality to insight and not as a part of soul. This research is to compare Reason between Sadra and Mirza. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - Analytical-critical review of the basics of Distinction theory in the Khorasan school of education
  hasan mohseni Mohammad Mohammad rezaii
  20.1001.1.98991735.1402.13.50.9.4
  The Distinction theory is one of the most important basics of the Khorasan School of Gnostic Knowledge (Maarif) because it concludes that the obligatory existence is distinct , with a critical approach to philosophical basics, such as the negation of the authenticity More

  The Distinction theory is one of the most important basics of the Khorasan School of Gnostic Knowledge (Maarif) because it concludes that the obligatory existence is distinct , with a critical approach to philosophical basics, such as the negation of the authenticity between obligatory and possible existence, and its reference to the Distinction theory . In order to understand the mentioned theory in detail, one should refer to the analysis of the relationship between the creator and the creature from the point of view of Mirza Mehdi Esfahani, the founder of the Khorasan School of Gnostic Knowledge (Maarif), therefore the major issue in this article is about the explanation of the above relationship. according to analytical-critical considerations, two opposite perspectives are deduced from his discussions, which originate from the conflict basics of his thought because, on the one hand, it raised distinction between the existence of the creator and the creature on how this connection is made, by believing in the invalidity of philosophical basics, and on the other hand, he treats passively towards philosophical discussions when it comes to explanation of the quality analysis. This research seeks to answer the question: “How is Mirza Mehdi Esfahani's point of view about the issue of the relationship between the existence of the creator and the creature which is focusing on his own works and also one of the foundations of Distinction theory, has been raised?" What is presented in this article is a critical analysis of Distinction theory’s basics, including the relationship between the existence of the creator and the creature. Manuscript profile