Current Issue Issue 4 Vol 14 Winter 2025 Submit Your Paper Published Issues Vol. 14 ✓ Issue 4 - Winter 2025 ✓ Issue 3 - Autumn 2024 ✓ Issue 2 - Summer 2024 ✓ Issue 1 - Spring 2024 Vol. 13 ✓ Issue 4 - Winter 2023 ✓ Issue 3 - Autumn 2023 ✓ Issue 2 - Summer 2023 ✓ Issue 1 - Spring 2023 Vol. 12 ✓ Issue 4 - Winter 2022 ✓ Issue 3 - Autumn 2022 ✓ Issue 2 - Summer 2022 ✓ Issue 1 - Spring 2022 Vol. 11 ✓ Issue 4 - Winter 2021 ✓ Issue 3 - Autumn 2021 ✓ Issue 2 - Summer 2021 ✓ Issue 1 - Spring 2021 Vol. 10 ✓ Issue 4 - Winter 2021 ✓ Issue 3 - Autumn 2020 ✓ Issue 2 - Summer 2020 ✓ Issue 1 - Spring 2020 Vol. 9 ✓ Issue 36 - Winter 2020 ✓ Issue 35 - Autumn 2019 ✓ Issue 34 - Summer 2019 ✓ Issue 33 - Spring 2019 Vol. 8 ✓ Issue 32 - Winter 2019 ✓ Issue 31 - Autumn 2018 ✓ Issue 30 - Summer 2018 ✓ Issue 29 - Spring 2018 Vol. 7 ✓ Issue 28 - Winter 2018 ✓ Issue 27 - Autumn 2017 ✓ Issue 26 - Summer 2017 ✓ Issue 25 - Spring 2017 ✓ Issue 1 - Autumn 2017 Vol. 6 ✓ Issue 24 - Winter 2017 ✓ Issue 23 - Autumn 2016 ✓ Issue 22 - Summer 2016 ✓ Issue 21 - Spring 2016 Menu Contact Journal Browse • Current Issue • By Issue • Author Index • By Subject • By Author
List of Articles Adaptation. Open Access Article Abstract Page Full-Text 1 - The social revolutionary revolution is a social political goal. It is a process that is driven by mass action leading to the aspirations arising from long-term ideas and by breaking away from the past, which is accompanied by inequality and the future of new norms with justice And Aristotle believes that existing inequalities are among the factors behind the revolution. The purpose of the present study is to explain the sociology and comparisons of the revolutions in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Iran, which has been analyzed using the ideas of the Jews and the people. The research methodology is the methodology for reviewing and analyzing The content of the relevant texts is a tool for collecting field information. The results showed that among the common causes behind these revolutions: the political and administrative failure of the rulers, despotism and absolute freedom, and the taking of people, the widespread financial and social crises and its consequences (unemployment, Inflation, reduced economic growth, social harm, reduced social trust and socialism, anomalies, etc.), the presence of intellectuals and people in the scene, the existence of virtual social networks from other revolutions, the existence of guiding and minded leaders, dependence and unbalanced development, and the separation The revolution of Iran with these revolutions: the root of it Another distinction was that of the leadership of Iran, which came from the people and the people. Seyyed Hossein Taghavi 20.1001.1.98991735.1400.12.45.3.7 Open Access Article Abstract Page Full-Text 2 - Comparative study of rationalism in Mu'tazila and New Mu'tazila thought zeinab shafavi Aziz Javan pour Heravi Tavakkol Kohi Beigloo
