تکفیر

List of Articles تکفیر

Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
1 - The Forbiddance of Takfir to Kiblah Believers on Viewpoint of Prolocutors and Jurists of Shia and Sunni
abbasali rostami

The problem of Takfir is more a theological issue than a juridical one, and it is faith-based, since many jurists and prolocutors maintain lack and rote between blasphemy and faith. In other words, if a human being does not have faith in God and monotheism, he/she is co More

The problem of Takfir is more a theological issue than a juridical one, and it is faith-based, since many jurists and prolocutors maintain lack and rote between blasphemy and faith. In other words, if a human being does not have faith in God and monotheism, he/she is considered as Kafir; however, due to the outcomes and consequences issued in jurisprudence, it is been of interest to jurists. In the present study, the viewpoint of popular Islamic scholar regarding Takfir for Kiblah believers is reviewed and it is discussed whether or not this issue is legal and approved on Islamic leaders vision. A majority of prolocutors and jurists of Shia and Sunni consider Kiblah believers as Muslim, and consider property, life, and sanctity for them. On the contrast,, a few people ignore the decree of their leader implying blasphemy to other Muslims and consider their killing as permitted. Manuscript profile
Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
2 - Mystical unity of the existence in the Imamite jurisprudence
Mohammad Rasul Ahangaran ss dd
20.1001.1.98991735.1400.10.39.3.9

One of the beliefs formed among a number of muslims is a mystical unity of existence that is the place of the dispute between mystics and some jurists.it is considered as a pure oneness and at the other hand it is regarded as a disbelief. Therefore, it is necessary to c More

One of the beliefs formed among a number of muslims is a mystical unity of existence that is the place of the dispute between mystics and some jurists.it is considered as a pure oneness and at the other hand it is regarded as a disbelief. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the aspects of the issue by study of the jurists” words of the mystics” words. After the survey of the jurists ' statements as well as the discourse on unity of existence, there are two main points of the question: first, excommunication absolutely and the second is conditional. It seems that it is possible to match the first point of view with sofia ignorants wich their words are obviously near to pantheism and solvent thought. انگاری of the . on the other hand , according to the fact that the primary principle is “ who confeses to islam orally is a muslim ” therefore blievers to the unity of existence are muslim and pure and essentially the jurisprudent , until the issue is not clear to him , it will not be permitted . Moreover, the emergence of mystic jurisprudent and the jurisprudent mystics and their viewpoint on the issue of knowledge is very helpful. In this paper, descriptive - analytical method and library data have been used. Manuscript profile
Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
3 - The arguments of those who believe in disbelief in jurisprudence (criticism and review)
mohamad ansari
20.1001.1.98991735.1402.13.51.12.9

The phenomenon of excommunication as a theological and jurisprudential issue has emerged in human societies throughout history, and sometimes people have shown many reactions to this phenomenon. For this reason, the issue of opposing disbelief has been criticized among More

The phenomenon of excommunication as a theological and jurisprudential issue has emerged in human societies throughout history, and sometimes people have shown many reactions to this phenomenon. For this reason, the issue of opposing disbelief has been criticized among the Imami scholars of the religion, and various interpretations of it have been created along with numerous divisions. Infidelity is divided into theological and jurisprudential dimensions, and many differences between the two can be seen in the opinion of scholars. Some scholars consider the believers to opposite religion to be infidels in jurisprudence, some consider them to be infidels in theology, and some consider them to be Muslims. Of course, those scholars who are against the disbelief of jurisprudence, who are few in number and sometimes have a history of reporting, exclude the oppressed opponents from the circle of disbelief in jurisprudence. This research examines these views with descriptive-analytical library studies. In the upcoming article, the ambiguities and questions in this field have been addressed with descriptive analytical method and library tools and new results have been studied. Manuscript profile

Current Issue

Published Issues

Menu

Browse

List of Articles تکفیر