• OpenAccess
    • List of Articles خداوند

      • Open Access Article

        1 - Explaining the Existential Relationship of God with the Creatures by Investigating and Criticizing the Reasonable Reason in Sadra's Wisdom
        Ahmad saeidi Yaser  Hosseinpour Mehdi  Imani Moghaddam
        According to his existential authenticity, Sadr al-Mutawla'in established an existence in the levels of existence and called it a special formulation, but there were various interpretations of what he meant in terms of existence. Some of the unity of the existence of ex More
        According to his existential authenticity, Sadr al-Mutawla'in established an existence in the levels of existence and called it a special formulation, but there were various interpretations of what he meant in terms of existence. Some of the unity of the existence of existence is a modest doctrine of transcendental wisdom to bring the philosophers' minds closer to the ultimate vote of Mulla Sadra, the personal unity of existence. Some others believe that the existence of the existence is a philosophical version and an accurate interpretation of the unity of the witnesses of the mystics. But some believe that the unity of the mystical existence means the existence of all beings in the same vein and Sadra's arrangement is exactly the same. On this basis, matrix means that there is only one supernatural existence, and many, despite being, exist without the existence of a supreme, absolute and unified entity. In other words, in the opinion of the proponents of this interpretation, Sadr al-Muta'l-أīni sought to prove the existence of all being in the presence of God, or in other words, to prove the existence of God for all beings. In this article, the recent interpretation of Mulla Sadra's ultimate view assumes And with this principle, we have narrated and reviewed some of his arguments to prove this interpretation. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Study of Kant and Ghazali's view of proving the Existence of God
        faride hakimi mahdi dehbashi
        In his critique of theoretical reason, Kant holds that all the arguments are proof of the existence of God as an existential argument. He criticizes this argument a lot, so he expresses it in the form of an innate argument. Kant's sense of nature actually means the kind More
        In his critique of theoretical reason, Kant holds that all the arguments are proof of the existence of God as an existential argument. He criticizes this argument a lot, so he expresses it in the form of an innate argument. Kant's sense of nature actually means the kind of talent that one acquires. Al-Ghazali, after expressing the proof of hadith, in the second round of his life, discusses the nature of nature and uses it in various meanings such as instinct and reason. He also does not consider nature to be achieved by rational reasoning. Ghazali believes that God exists in our nature, while Kant believes that we gain it throughout our lives, not that it exists in our imagination from day one. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - Judge Abdul Jabbar Mu'tazili's view on seeing God is based on the rule of denial
        sed reza fatemi Einollah khademi
        The possibility of seeing God with the body by man or not, has always been a matter of great concern among theologians as well as various Muslim sects, which can be understood from their conflicting views. Some differences, such as the similarity of human acceptance of More
        The possibility of seeing God with the body by man or not, has always been a matter of great concern among theologians as well as various Muslim sects, which can be understood from their conflicting views. Some differences, such as the similarity of human acceptance of God, eventually led to skepticism, and some others, such as assumptions, became algebraic. Judge Abdul Jabbar Mu'tazili in this regard, the method of interpretation, along with the adoption of the rationalist method of the Mu'tazilites; Choose the premise of reason in the book, tradition, consensus, and reason. He also proved the concept of denying the sight of God by presenting a rational reason - confrontation - and six narrative reasons - according to the verses of the Holy Quran. The authors have made a serious critique of his views, which have not been seen intuitively or by heart. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - A Critical Study of Fakhr Razi's Rationalist Approach in Theology
        Gholamhussein  Gerami
        The ways to attain theism can be divided into four general approaches: rationalism, narrativeism, empiricism, and intuitionism. Fakhr al-Din al-Razi is one of the Ash'arite thinkers who believes in the rationalist approach in theology and considers reasoning and proof a More
        The ways to attain theism can be divided into four general approaches: rationalism, narrativeism, empiricism, and intuitionism. Fakhr al-Din al-Razi is one of the Ash'arite thinkers who believes in the rationalist approach in theology and considers reasoning and proof as the only way to know God. Accordingly, he believes that the cognition that is obtained for us about God Almighty is a general and indeterminate knowledge. Fakhr al-Din al-Razi's rationalist approach can be criticized from three perspectives. The most important drawbacks of such an approach are the methodological confinement as well as disregard for the knowledge by presence (consciousness) and intuitive approach as the most valuable way to attain the knowledge of God. Refusal to accept the common innate nature of human beings and consequently the denial of innate theism is another problem of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi's rationalist approach. Acceptance of the possibility of seeing God by man, and the presentation of various Qur'anic evidence to prove it by Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, which in fact leads to personal knowledge, is one of the important challenges for him that causes an internal conflict in his theological stances. Manuscript profile