The premise of this research is to presuppose the infallibility and virtues of Hazrat Zahra S, which is expressed in the sources of the sects, as well as the transformation of her Imamatelessness based on the acceptable hadith of the sects, "who is dead ..."The proof of
More
The premise of this research is to presuppose the infallibility and virtues of Hazrat Zahra S, which is expressed in the sources of the sects, as well as the transformation of her Imamatelessness based on the acceptable hadith of the sects, "who is dead ..."The proof of Imamate and Caliphate has been presented by relying on his positive and negative sayings and actions in the form of two logical analogical and exceptional analogies. Citing protests against Imamate texts, his outspoken defense of Imam Ali's leadership in the Fadakiyah sermon and his conversations with women visiting him, and his belief in Imam Ali's Imamate, citing specific behaviors such as night insinuations, uprising for debate and sermons. ProvedBy not believing in the caliphate, the claimants of the caliphate also cited negative statements such as expressing anger, expressing anger, threatening to curse and negative behaviors such as "non-violent speech", "practical obstruction of forced allegiance" and "will to bury the grave". The groundwork for proving the Imamate of Imam Ali (as) has been laid.
Manuscript profile
