argument

List of Articles argument

Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
1 - Challenges of the Qur'anic Intellectual Principles in the Critique Shiites
Mahdi Fathi Ahmad moradkhani Hosin Alavimehr

Hadith is the second source of inference of Islamic laws for Shias and Sunnis after Quran and many jurisprudential laws of Islam are explicated by the Prophet (pbuh). Muslims, at the early years of Islam and after, following the command of God who says: (( وَ مَا ءَاتَئ More

Hadith is the second source of inference of Islamic laws for Shias and Sunnis after Quran and many jurisprudential laws of Islam are explicated by the Prophet (pbuh). Muslims, at the early years of Islam and after, following the command of God who says: (( وَ مَا ءَاتَئكُمُ الرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَ مَا نهَئكُمْ عَنْهُ فَانتَهُوا (al-Hashr/7) “whatever the messenger gives you, accept it; and whatever he forbids you, abstain” obeyed his commands and were faithful to his words. Since, the great lord explicates that obedience from the prophet is obedience from me (مَّن يُطِعِ الرَّسُولَ فَقَدْ أَطَاعَ اللَّهَ) (an-Nesa/80) “whomever obeys the Prophet, therefore obeyed me”, the tradition of prophet (pbuh) has been a light for the Muslims. However, the thought that has been long established against the truth of hadith and tradition of prophet (pbuh) is known as Quranism, who believe that in Quran; no clear reference or emphasis is made upon obedience from traditions, also there are controversies among them that we cannot rely on them to build our social and religious life, as well as the jurisprudential laws. This group consider Quran as the only source of Islamic laws. In this study, it is tried to investigate their historical and geographical roots, express their intellectual principles, and criticize them with respect to Shia and Sunni point of views. Manuscript profile
Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
2 - Study of Kant and Ghazali's view of proving the Existence of God
faride hakimi mahdi dehbashi
20.1001.1.98991735.1399.10.38.12.2

In his critique of theoretical reason, Kant holds that all the arguments are proof of the existence of God as an existential argument. He criticizes this argument a lot, so he expresses it in the form of an innate argument. Kant's sense of nature actually means the kind More

In his critique of theoretical reason, Kant holds that all the arguments are proof of the existence of God as an existential argument. He criticizes this argument a lot, so he expresses it in the form of an innate argument. Kant's sense of nature actually means the kind of talent that one acquires. Al-Ghazali, after expressing the proof of hadith, in the second round of his life, discusses the nature of nature and uses it in various meanings such as instinct and reason. He also does not consider nature to be achieved by rational reasoning. Ghazali believes that God exists in our nature, while Kant believes that we gain it throughout our lives, not that it exists in our imagination from day one. Manuscript profile
Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
3 - headship of Imam Ali (AS) in the Fatimid tradition
Mohammad Reza Pakbaz Abdolhossein Khosro Panah Javad Abolghasemi
20.1001.1.98991735.1400.11.41.11.4

The premise of this research is to presuppose the infallibility and virtues of Hazrat Zahra S, which is expressed in the sources of the sects, as well as the transformation of her Imamatelessness based on the acceptable hadith of the sects, "who is dead ..."The proof of More

The premise of this research is to presuppose the infallibility and virtues of Hazrat Zahra S, which is expressed in the sources of the sects, as well as the transformation of her Imamatelessness based on the acceptable hadith of the sects, "who is dead ..."The proof of Imamate and Caliphate has been presented by relying on his positive and negative sayings and actions in the form of two logical analogical and exceptional analogies. Citing protests against Imamate texts, his outspoken defense of Imam Ali's leadership in the Fadakiyah sermon and his conversations with women visiting him, and his belief in Imam Ali's Imamate, citing specific behaviors such as night insinuations, uprising for debate and sermons. ProvedBy not believing in the caliphate, the claimants of the caliphate also cited negative statements such as expressing anger, expressing anger, threatening to curse and negative behaviors such as "non-violent speech", "practical obstruction of forced allegiance" and "will to bury the grave". The groundwork for proving the Imamate of Imam Ali (as) has been laid. Manuscript profile

Current Issue

Published Issues

Menu

Browse

List of Articles argument