Sadra and Heidegger both surpass the principality of quiddity and lead to the principality of Being, and both believe that entities and their relations can be understood and interpreted in the light of the unity of Being. Moreover, both recognize entities as manifestati
More
Sadra and Heidegger both surpass the principality of quiddity and lead to the principality of Being, and both believe that entities and their relations can be understood and interpreted in the light of the unity of Being. Moreover, both recognize entities as manifestations of being and interpret the plurality based on unity. Sadra and Heidegger don’t consider Being as an entity itself, but the foundation of entities that can never be disclosed completely. Although entities manifest Being, they conceal it themselves. Thus, each entity manifests the absolute Being and at the same time conceals it. Sadra implies that God is in an absolute absence, but Heidegger merely refers to Being in general which is current in entities, and never indicates explicitly God as the creator of entities. Sadra's theory of gradation of Being is the best explanation of . manifestation and concealment of Being, but Heidegger has no words in this manner .Sadra implies that God is in an absolute absence, but Heidegger merely refers to Being in general which is current in entities, and never indicates explicitly God as the creator of entities. Sadra's theory of gradation of Being is the best explanation of manifestation and concealment of Being, but Heidegger has no words in this manne.
Manuscript profile
