List of Articles اختیار

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Study Of Theoretical Philosophy Of History In Nahj Al-Balagha; Case Study Determinism And Authority
  سید مهدی  حسینی شیروانی   Mohammad 
  Determinism And Free Will Of The Most Important And Oldest Theoretical Philosophy Of History. The Importance And Sensitivity Of This Issue From The Religious And Theological Issues Because That Is The Will, Ability, Power, Science Servants Of God Verbs, Especially Verbs More

  Determinism And Free Will Of The Most Important And Oldest Theoretical Philosophy Of History. The Importance And Sensitivity Of This Issue From The Religious And Theological Issues Because That Is The Will, Ability, Power, Science Servants Of God Verbs, Especially Verbs And Destiny And The Will Of The People And Will Closely Tied. The Question That Arises Here Is Whether The Views Of Imam Ali (As) In Nahj Al-Human Beings Or Force And Whether This Autonomy Is In Contradiction With God's Will? Accordingly, The Findings Indicate That Imam Ali (As) In Nahj Al-Balagha Does Not Believe In Coincidence And Historical Determinism And Believed In The Cause And Effect Of Events And Historical Events. So That Human Philosophical Insight Of Imam Ali (As) A Victim Helplessly Against The God Of History, But Their Own History And Its Manufacturer And Can Be Across The Divine Decree, Lead To Welfare. Imam (AS) And The Traditions Of The Human Will To The Will Of God And Not The Dominant Force On The Date. Accordingly, Autonomous Being, Is One Of The Most Important Features Of The Nahj Al-Balagha. The Research Method In Collecting Library - Documentation And Analytical Judgment Is In Place Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Comparatively Surveys the Issue of "Determinism" and "Free Will" among Abraham Religions
     
  This article comparatively surveys the issue of "determinism" and "free will" among holy religions. According to the heavenly religions, we want to distinguish the stand of free will in human being; moreover, whether Allah has created him in determinism or thoroughly gi More

  This article comparatively surveys the issue of "determinism" and "free will" among holy religions. According to the heavenly religions, we want to distinguish the stand of free will in human being; moreover, whether Allah has created him in determinism or thoroughly given him free will is in the question. Separately surveying these issues in all three religions, this article distinguishably circulates theirs experts' verdicts; furthermore, it compares and adapts their verdicts to each, considering the differences, and finally it selects the appreciated and complete one. Initially we took a look at the verdicts of Ash'arīyūn, Mu'tazilah, and Shiite in the school of Islam, then the verdicts of jewish experts such as Sa'dīyā, Ibrāhīm ibn 'adhrā, and Ibrāhīm ibn dāvūd have been discussed. The verdicts of christian experts like Saint Augustines, Pelagius, and their companions have been examined at the end Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Theory of Acquisition and its Different Approaches
     
  Regarding man’s actions, from viewpoint of compulsion or volition, among religion researchers, there are different approaches. Ash’arites and its head believe in theory of acquisition and claimed man’s role in his actions is acquisition, not creation. But during history More

  Regarding man’s actions, from viewpoint of compulsion or volition, among religion researchers, there are different approaches. Ash’arites and its head believe in theory of acquisition and claimed man’s role in his actions is acquisition, not creation. But during history Ash’arite ‘ulama, have got different ideas and readings concerning the reality of acquisition. Studying the Ash’arite works, the author found seven prominent approaches and then criticized and evaluated them. He demonstrated that the Ash’arite theories of compulsion or volition not only are not able to explain the reality of acquisition, but they lead to either compulsion or indeterminism. Therefore, some Ash’arite ‘ulama denied the theory of acquisition and accepted the Shi’i theory of intermediate position. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - Investigating the Relationship between the Terms of the Traditions of Satan with the Authority and Justice
  Abdollah Niknam
  20.1001.1.98991735.1400.10.37.7.9
  Some hadiths mean that the happiness or cruelty of man is predetermined and his talent determines his destiny. These traditions are known as the "traditions of Satan". The important question in the way of these hadiths is the relation of these traditions to human author More

  Some hadiths mean that the happiness or cruelty of man is predetermined and his talent determines his destiny. These traditions are known as the "traditions of Satan". The important question in the way of these hadiths is the relation of these traditions to human authority and their apparent contradictions with divine justice. The answer to this question requires the examination of the document and the implications of the above hadiths. This article aims to study the implications and implications of these hadiths and has attempted to draw the following conclusions: First: Satan's traditions deal with both the physical and spiritual aspects of human beings; There is no difference between the authority of man and the content of the traditions of Satanism: Fourth: These traditions are not incompatible with divine justice; That is: some exist and some lack justice. In general, the lack of difference between creatures is incompatible with divine justice. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  5 - Rumi's rational methodology in order to prove human free will in Masnavi
  Abolfazl  Afsharipour reza Haidari Nori reza fahimi
  20.1001.1.98991735.1402.13.50.2.7
  The issue of determinism and free will is one of the most complex points of theology in the religion of Islam. According to the diverse interpretations of different theological sects and intellectual and religious schools, including mystics, from the verses of the Holy More

  The issue of determinism and free will is one of the most complex points of theology in the religion of Islam. According to the diverse interpretations of different theological sects and intellectual and religious schools, including mystics, from the verses of the Holy Quran and the hadiths of the Prophet; it has been followed different and sometimes contradictory interpretations; to the extent that each of the intellectual societies, including the Ash'arites and Mu’tazilites, have been in constant search to prove their beliefs according to their own intellectual and ideological basis. Meanwhile, Muslim mystics, including Maulana Jalaluddin, due to his great work, Masnavi, mentions one of the strong and convincing reasons in order to prove free will and human will that the use the rational method of the thought power is in absorbing desires and seeking phenomena which is referred to as "common value". By the rational methodology, Rumi seeks to prove the subject of free will and the negation of determinism, and in the light of human free will, he proves the power of thought. The findings of this research, which has been done in a descriptive-analytical manner and based on library and documentary studies, show that the power of thought in human has been considered as a force to prove the power of free will in Rumi's theology. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  6 - Freedom of will from view of Immanuel Kant and Mulla Sadra
  Batoul Yarali Mohsenn Fahim mojtaba jafari
  20.1001.1.98991735.1402.13.50.12.7
  This essay in the field of philosofy of athics is a comparative research about freedom of will. According to Mullah Sadra, human actions are both voluntary and coercive. In his philosophy, the opposition of causal necessity to free will is one of the most important an More

  This essay in the field of philosofy of athics is a comparative research about freedom of will. According to Mullah Sadra, human actions are both voluntary and coercive. In his philosophy, the opposition of causal necessity to free will is one of the most important and ambiguous issues. He proves the freedom of will through practical reason .He accepts a middle way in this case and calls his theory a theory of who are firmly grounded in knowledge. From this point of view, human actions are attributed to themselves on the one hand, and on the other hand, according to monotheism, actions are attributed to God. From Kant's point of view that free will is one of the fundamental foundations of his athics philosophy. He considers the desire for freedom to be inherent in human beings and man, as a rational being, has free will. According to Kant, the human will is a dependent will, but the will of God is a completely independent will. He considers theoretical reason incapable of proving the free will of man, but presupposes it in practical reason. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  7 - Comparison of the opinions of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi on the issue of free will and destiny
  Somayeh Heiran Abbas  Ahmadi Saiedi mohamad ali akhgar
  In this research, the issue of free will in humans and divine destiny in the views of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi are examined and then compared. The importance of the research is due to the distinction between Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theol More

  In this research, the issue of free will in humans and divine destiny in the views of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi are examined and then compared. The importance of the research is due to the distinction between Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theological approach to answer the question of free will in man and divine destiny, while both thinkers have the same procedure in explaining the issue of Qada, Qadr and free will in the philosophical discussion or There are mystics of unity. The most important similarity between the views of these two thinkers is in considering the will in humans as non-inherent, which they see in the light of God's innate will. The most important difference between Ibn Arabi's and Ibn Sina's opinions regarding divine judgment and destiny is Ibn Sina's reliance and emphasis on the knowledge of God's mercy and Ibn Arabi's emphasis on divine judgment. This difference is rooted in Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theological approach to analyze the subject. Regarding free will in man, Ibn Sina believes that by performing certain actions, a person has the ability to exercise his opinion and change his destiny, and God has decreed such that there is certainty and certainty in man's actions, and that judgment is based on his free will and will. And the divine decree has determined the free will in the actions of humans. According to Ibn Arabi, the judgment and fate of God's decree is in the order of fixed nobles and their requirements, and therefore the will and free will of man are also in their domain. And Qada and Qadr do not violate human free will. The method of this research is based on descriptive-analytical and using library texts. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  8 - Criticism and review of the views of theologians about the creation of actions based on the theory of Sadr al-Mutalahin Shirazi
  Ozra  Yousefi Seyyed Hassan  Bothaie Mohammad Reza  Motaqian Rohollah  NadAli
  The issue of "deterrence and free will" is one of the important theological and philosophical issues of human voluntary actions. The thinkers tried to explain the truth and dimensions of this issue based on their religious, scientific and epistemological foundations and More

  The issue of "deterrence and free will" is one of the important theological and philosophical issues of human voluntary actions. The thinkers tried to explain the truth and dimensions of this issue based on their religious, scientific and epistemological foundations and assumptions. Some were inclined to the theory of determinism and others to the theories of free will. Acknowledging the monotheism of verbs, Ash'ari theologians believe that all the verbs of the servants are God's creation and man is the only current acquirer that God creates by man's hand. Mu'tazila, motivated by the negation of evils from God, have denied the issuance of the verb ``Abd'' from God, and consider ``Abd'' as the origin of optional verbs. Sadr al-Mutalahin, by using rational reasons and revealed principles, has sought to gather the will of man and monotheism of actions. In this research, the Ash'areh principles and Mu'tazila principles about the voluntary actions of man are explained and the analysis and criticism of Mulla Sadra's principles about the voluntary actions of man are explained and its relationship with the monotheism of verbs is analyzed and researched according to rational and narrative reasons. It will be said that the authentic view of Imamia is Mulla Sadra's view. Manuscript profile